ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India
Teaching pathology differently: Comparision between three diverse teaching learning methods.
Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- An integrated teaching model combining PBL and medical humanities education for pathology laboratory teaching: a randomized controlled study.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Blended and digital approaches in histology and pathology teaching: A scoping review.Anatomical sciences education · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of blended learning versus conventional didactic teaching in pathology education outcomes.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- From classroom to clinic: evaluating a clinical pathology course to strengthen pathology report literacy of medical interns.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Lab sciences: Going beyond the realms of diagnosis!!Medical journal, Armed Forces IndiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pathology is a subject which demands deep understanding of the fundamentals. This entails regular reading, discussion, viewing the organs and slides to understand the evolution of the disease. For a sound understanding of the subject a robust clinicopathological correlation is a must. However, quite frequently students resort to rote learning of the concepts which over time leads to losing interest in the subject. In this pandemic induced circumstance, the challenge had suddenly increased. Methods: We embarked on this project with an aim to compare the effectiveness of the traditional didactic lecture (DL), Online web base learning which is the E learning (EL) and a mix of voice annotated/ audio video presentation followed by interactive large group discussion on the topic , which is a Blended learning (BL) and come to the best possible Teaching-Learning Method (TLM). Results: 124 second year MBBS students participated in the study, of which 41 participated in the DL group, 42 were in EL group and 41 were in BL group. They were taught a topic on alcoholic liver disease. There was significant improvement in the scholastic performance of the BL group. The BL group perceived this method as more interesting and interactive. Conclusion: The study highlights the advantage of BL over EL and DL as the former provides an all round understanding and transforms the learning experience of the students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.