Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39990516›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology2025

The four pillars of endohepatology.

David L Diehl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Technical considerations in endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: A comprehensive review.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David L DiehlGeisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4128-3839

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past several years, there has been increasing interaction between Hepatology and Endoscopy, mainly facilitated by EUS-guided modalities. There are 4 main areas that have led to the emergence of what has been called "Endohepatology". The first is EUS-guided parenchymal liver biopsy (EUS-LB). An optimal technique EUS-LB has been developed using a 19G EUS fine needle biopsy needle with "wet suction." There are several advantages to EUS-LB. Another component of Endohepatology is the ability to directly measuring portal pressure gradient (PPG) under EUS guidance. A 25G needle can be inserted directly into branches of the hepatic vein and portal vein to measure PPG. Although this technique requires a sedated endoscopic procedure, it is technically easier and better tolerated than the traditional transjugular approach and is very safe. Newer techniques of endoscopic management of gastric varices using EUS-guided injection of glues and coils is another driver of Endohepatology. EUS-guided glue injection is safer than direct endoscopic injection, and the use of coils decreases the incidence of glue embolization. The fourth pillar is expanded use of EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GB) with lumen apposing metal stents. This is beginning to revolutionize management of gallbladder disease in cirrhotic patients who are poor candidates for cholecystectomy. Endohepatology will grow as these 4 main applications become more widespread and Hepatologists become more comfortable with the role of Endohepatology in patient management.

Indexed as

cirrhosisendoscopic ultrasoundgastric varicesliver biopsyportal hypertensionportal pressure gradient

Identifiers

PMID39990516
PMCPMC11842896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.