ArticleJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology2025
From data to artificial intelligence: evaluating the readiness of gastrointestinal endoscopy datasets.
Article in Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synthetic data generation: challenges and perspectives for gastrointestinal medicine.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Review
- Emerging Endorobotic and AI Technologies in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Review of Design, Validation, and Translational Pathways.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Green endoscopy: A review of strategies for sustainable practice.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Review
- Machine learning in gastrointestinal endoscopy: challenges and opportunities.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Role of Artificial Intelligence in Gastroenterology Training (2005-2025): Trends, Tools, and Challenges.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) into gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy represents a promising advancement in gastroenterology. With over 40 published randomized controlled trials and numerous ongoing clinical trials, gastroenterology leads other medical disciplines in AI research. Computer-aided detection algorithms for identifying colorectal polyps have achieved regulatory approval and are in routine clinical use, while other AI applications for GI endoscopy are in advanced development stages. Near-term opportunities include the potential for computer-aided diagnosis to replace conventional histopathology for diagnosing small colon polyps and increased AI automation in capsule endoscopy. Despite significant development in research settings, the generalizability and robustness of AI models in real clinical practice remain inconsistent. The GI field lags behind other medical disciplines in the breadth of novel AI algorithms, with only 13 out of 882 Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved AI models focussed on GI endoscopy as of June 2024. Additionally, existing GI endoscopy image databases are disproportionately focussed on colon polyps, lacking representation of the diversity of other endoscopic findings. High-quality datasets, encompassing a wide range of patient demographics, endoscopic equipment types, and disease states, are crucial for developing effective AI models for GI endoscopy. This article reviews the current state of GI endoscopy datasets, barriers to progress, including dataset size, data diversity, annotation quality, and ethical issues in data collection and usage, and future needs for advancing AI in GI endoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.