ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2025
Patient Satisfaction with Primary Health Care Services in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient Safety Culture Among Healthcare Professionals in Jeddah First Health Cluster:Saudi medical journal · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence integration and patient safety culture: a cross-sectional study of healthcare professionals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- How Different Medical Practices Are Associated with Types of Patient Complaints in Russian Clinics.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Assessing organizational commitment among healthcare employees in the Asir Health Cluster, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Patient satisfaction with emergency department services in selected Saudi hospitals: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Satisfaction with primary health care services among patients with chronic diseases: a qualitative study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Pharmaceutical Care Through Women's Eyes: Insights from a Cross-Sectional Study in Jordan.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Review
- Development and Validation of the Arabic Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction (Ar-SAPS) in General Practice Clinics of a Tertiary Academic Hospital.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Determinants of patient satisfaction among outpatients with chronic illnesses in the region of medina, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Three-year trends and seasonal variation in patient satisfaction with primary health care services in Saudi Arabia: results from the national patient experience measurement program (2022-2024).Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patient satisfaction emerges as an indicator for enhancing the quality of health organizations, facilitating the evaluation and identification of the most significant characteristics of patient experience and their corresponding satisfaction levels. This can guide decisions to improve healthcare services and develop policies for better care. This study seeks to assess the level of patient satisfaction with primary healthcare (PHC) services in a large military hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and to determine the extent of association between the level of satisfaction and patients' social and demographic factors. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out on a convenient sample who received primary health care at the Security Forces Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between January and June 2023. Comparisons between qualitative variables were made using the chi-square to test significance and the One-Way ANOVA test was used to compare the means of total patient satisfaction scores, p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Among the 379 participants, 268 (70.7%) were males, 271 (71.2%) were married, 222 (58.6%) were military personnel, and 207 (54.6%) were between the ages of 31 and 49. The average satisfaction with PHC clinics was 52.1 (SD=4.9, highest score=60) while the average satisfaction with general evaluation was 27.6 (SD=3.4, highest score=35). Male participants exhibited greater satisfaction levels (M= 117.8, SD=12.8) than their female counterparts (M= 115.7, SD=15.3, p-value = 0.01). Patients aged 18-30 had greater satisfaction levels (M= 117.5, SD=16.8, p-value = 0.02). Individuals who were single reported higher levels of satisfaction (M= 118.3, SD=16.2, p-value = 0.001). Participants with lower earnings (less than 5000 SR) had greater satisfaction levels compared to individuals having a greater income (p-value = 0.002). Conclusion: Patients attending a PHC center in a large military hospital in Riyadh generally reported high levels of satisfaction, particularly among male, single, younger, and low-income individuals. Despite these favorable results, several aspects of healthcare need enhancement to fulfill patient expectations and guarantee optimal healthcare provision. Therefore, healthcare practitioners must persist in determining and addressing these areas to guarantee that patients obtain optimal care and experience in primary healthcare clinics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.