ArticleCancer management and research2025
"Enhancing Liposarcoma Prognosis - A New Predictive Scoring System Integrating Histopathological Insights".
Article in Cancer management and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liposarcoma: State of the Art-A Scoping Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Magnetic Hydrogels as a Treatment for Oncological Pathologies.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Deep Introspection Regarding Cumulative Prognostic Factors in Liposarcoma and Atypical Lipomatous Tumor.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Liposarcomas are malignant soft tissue tumours with heterogeneous features and variable prognosis. Each entity comprised in this group displays distinct morphology and harbours specific genetic alterations, which correlate with clinical behaviour and therapy response. The aim of this study is to analyse the clinical and histopathological features that can influence the prognosis of liposarcoma. We also present a newly designed scoring system that could be useful for predicting the risk of disease progression and death in patients with different liposarcoma subtypes. Materials and Methods: We carried out a retrospective multicentric study on 77 liposarcomas diagnosed between 2009 and 2023 that were followed up to assess the presence of metastases and survival of the patients. We evaluated the age, gender, tumour location and dimensions, histological subtype, mitotic index, presence and percentage of necrosis, and their association with disease progression and survival. Results: In this respect, progression-free survival was positively associated with lower mitotic index, somatic soft-tissue localization, well-differentiated and myxoid subtypes and absence of necrosis. Overall survival was negatively influenced by older age, higher mitotic index, dedifferentiated and pleomorphic subtypes and the presence of necrosis. Therefore, several clinical and histopathological features of liposarcomas, such as tumour location, mitotic index, and tumour necrosis can strongly predict the disease evolution. Discussion: This study focuses on developing a new scoring system that considers histologic subtype, mitotic index, and tumour necrosis as indicators that could predict the risk of disease progression and overall survival in patients with liposarcoma. The system classifies liposarcomas of any histological subtype into low-risk and high-risk tumours. Diagnosing liposarcomas using this two-tiered system could be useful for providing personalized therapy, in order to avoid relapses, metastases and improve the disease's prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.