Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39990276›Full record

ReviewCancer management and research2025

Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Efficacy, Safety, and Place in Therapy.

Utkarsh Goel, Saurabh Zanwar, Andrew John Cowan, Rahul Banerjee, Jack Khouri, Danai Dima

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer management and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Utkarsh GoelDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Saurabh ZanwarDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Andrew John CowanUniversity of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Rahul BanerjeeUniversity of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jack KhouriCleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2473-6528
Danai DimaUniversity of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) are two chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR T) therapies approved for use in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Initially approved for late line MM (>4 prior lines), these were recently approved for use in MM with 1-2 prior lines of therapy in April 2024. As their use outside of the pivotal clinical trials continues to expand, it is important to critically evaluate the safety and efficacy of these therapies. Further, it is important to identify patients that would be most likely to benefit from the use of CAR T in earlier lines of therapy. Cilta-cel was initially studied in the phase-I LEGEND-2 study, followed by CARTITUDE-1 and CARTITUDE-4 trials, demonstrating remarkable efficacy. A recent large real-world study also demonstrated similar efficacy, in a mostly pivotal trial ineligible patient population. Based on these impressive results, cilta-cel is currently being studied in trials for newly diagnosed as well as smoldering multiple myeloma. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are known toxicities of cilta-cel (and other CAR Ts), however movement and cognitive disorders (delayed neurotoxicity) and second primary malignancies are an evolving concern. In this article we discuss safety and efficacy data from existing cilta-cel studies. We propose that all patients with MM who have received ≥4 prior lines of therapy should be considered for CAR T. Earlier line use of CAR T should be restricted to patients with a high-risk disease phenotype (eg, functional high-risk disease). This disease phenotype has historically shown poor outcomes with standard triplet regimens and would be most likely to benefit from earlier use of CAR T: considering the availability of other safe and highly effective therapies, and potential high-risk toxicities of CAR T.

Indexed as

CAR Tchimeric antigen receptor T cell therapyciltacabtagene autoleucelmultiple myelomarelapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

Identifiers

PMID39990276
PMCPMC11847446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.