Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39990254›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2025

Accurate prediction of nucleic acid binding proteins using protein language model.

Siwen Wu, Jinbo Xu, Jun-Tao Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Human Omnibus of Targetable Pockets.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Siwen WuDepartment of Bioinformatics and Genomics, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, United States.
Jinbo XuToyota Technological Institute at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States.
Jun-Tao GuoDepartment of Bioinformatics and Genomics, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5949-8948

Funding

Investigation of ssDNA binding proteins and protein-ssDNA interactionsR15GM132846 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE · PI GUO, JUN-TAO · 2021 to 2021
$436k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM132846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Nucleic acid binding proteins (NABPs) play critical roles in various and essential biological processes. Many machine learning-based methods have been developed to predict different types of NABPs. However, most of these studies have limited applications in predicting the types of NABPs for any given protein with unknown functions, due to several factors such as dataset construction, prediction scope and features used for training and testing. In addition, single-stranded DNA binding proteins (DBP) (SSBs) have not been extensively investigated for identifying novel SSBs from proteins with unknown functions. Results: To improve prediction accuracy of different types of NABPs for any given protein, we developed hierarchical and multi-class models with machine learning-based methods and a feature extracted from protein language model ESM2. Our results show that by combining the feature from ESM2 and machine learning methods, we can achieve high prediction accuracy up to 95% for each stage in the hierarchical approach, and 85% for overall prediction accuracy from the multi-class approach. More importantly, besides the much improved prediction of other types of NABPs, the models can be used to accurately predict single-stranded DBPs, which is underexplored. Availability and implementation: The datasets and code can be found at https://figshare.com/projects/Prediction_of_nucleic_acid_binding_proteins_using_protein_language_model/211555.

Identifiers

PMID39990254
PMCPMC11845279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.