ArticleBioinformatics advances2025
Accurate prediction of nucleic acid binding proteins using protein language model.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sequence-Based Models for RNA-Protein Interactions Imputation Might Be Insufficient for Novel Signal Prediction in eCLIP Data.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- caRBP-Pred: Leveraging Protein Language Models for the Prediction of Chromatin-Associated RNA-Binding Proteins.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- DFL-MHC: MHC identification model based on dual-stage training and multi-view feature fusion.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- The Human Omnibus of Targetable Pockets.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
- DRBP-EDP: classification of DNA-binding proteins and RNA-binding proteins using ESM-2 and dual-path neural network.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: Nucleic acid binding proteins (NABPs) play critical roles in various and essential biological processes. Many machine learning-based methods have been developed to predict different types of NABPs. However, most of these studies have limited applications in predicting the types of NABPs for any given protein with unknown functions, due to several factors such as dataset construction, prediction scope and features used for training and testing. In addition, single-stranded DNA binding proteins (DBP) (SSBs) have not been extensively investigated for identifying novel SSBs from proteins with unknown functions. Results: To improve prediction accuracy of different types of NABPs for any given protein, we developed hierarchical and multi-class models with machine learning-based methods and a feature extracted from protein language model ESM2. Our results show that by combining the feature from ESM2 and machine learning methods, we can achieve high prediction accuracy up to 95% for each stage in the hierarchical approach, and 85% for overall prediction accuracy from the multi-class approach. More importantly, besides the much improved prediction of other types of NABPs, the models can be used to accurately predict single-stranded DBPs, which is underexplored. Availability and implementation: The datasets and code can be found at https://figshare.com/projects/Prediction_of_nucleic_acid_binding_proteins_using_protein_language_model/211555.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.