ReviewCanadian prosthetics & orthotics journal2024
Wound management, healing, and early prosthetic rehabilitation: Part 2 - A scoping review of physical biomarkers.
Review in Canadian prosthetics & orthotics journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Wound management, healing, and early prosthetic rehabilitation: Part 3 - A scoping review of chemical biomarkers.Canadian prosthetics & orthotics journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe timely provision of load-bearing prostheses significantly reduces healthcare costs and lowers post-amputation mortality risk. However, current methods for assessing residuum health remain subjective, underscoring the need for standardized, evidence-based approaches incorporating physical biomarkers to evaluate residual limb healing and determine readiness for prosthetic rehabilitation.
objectivesThis review aimed to identify predictive, diagnostic, and indicative physical biomarkers of healing of the tissues and structures found in the residual limbs of adults with amputation. METHODOLOGY: A scoping review was conducted following Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and PRISMA-ScR guidance. Searches using "biomarkers", "wound healing", and "amputation" were performed on May 6, 2023, on Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, PubMed, and CINAHL databases. Inclusion criteria were: 1) References to physical biomarkers and healing; 2) Residuum tissue healing; 3) Clear methodology with ethical approval; 4) Published from 2017 onwards. Articles were assessed for quality (QualSyst tool) and evidence level (JBI system), and categorized by study, wound, and model type. Physical biomarkers that were repeated not just within categories, but across more than one of the study categories were reported on.
findingsThe search strategy identified 3,306 sources, 157 of which met the inclusion criteria. Histology was the most frequently repeated physical biomarker used in 64 sources, offering crucial diagnostic insights into cellular healing processes. Additional repeated indicative and predictive physical biomarkers, including ankle-brachial index, oxygenation measures, perfusion, and blood pulse and pressure measurements, were reported in 25, 19, 13, and 12 sources, respectively, providing valuable data on tissue oxygenation and vascular health.
conclusionUltimately, adopting a multifaceted approach that integrates a diverse array of physical biomarkers (accounting for physiological factors and comorbidities known to influence healing) may substantially enhance our understanding of the healing process and inform the development of effective rehabilitation strategies for individuals undergoing amputation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.