ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025
Multivariable prediction of returning to work among early-onset colorectal cancer survivors in China: A two-year follow-up.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a machine learning-based return to work predictive model for young and middle-aged maintenance hemodialysis patients.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Navigating work life after colorectal cancer: insights into work ability and functioning - a Danish follow-up study.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The number of early-onset colorectal cancer survivors (EOCRCs) is increasing. The primary aim of rehabilitation after battling cancer is to enable patients to return to work, as they constitute a significant contributor to societal productivity. A predictive model was developed to identify priority populations requiring intervention and refine responses to increase their capacity to return to work after undergoing treatment for EOCRC. Methods: The baseline information was collected before patients were discharged at the end of their treatment course. The data of patients who returned to work were collected at 1 and 2 years after discharge. A predictive variable model was developed via binary logistic regression. The TRIPOD checklist was used. Results: At 1 year, 64.7% of the EOCRC survivors had returned to work. Male sex, education, return to work self efficacy, re-entry readiness and social support increased the possibility of returning to work; higher levels of self-perceived fatigue and lower levels of family care decreased the possibility of returning to work within the 1-year model. At 2 years, 72.8% of the EOCRC survivors had returned to work. In the 2-year model, education, self-transcendence, return to work self efficacy, re-entry readiness and occupational environment increased the possibility of returning to work; self-perceived fatigue and psychosocial adjustment decreased the possibility of returning to work. Conclusions: The results of this study can guide early assessment and intervention for EOCRC survivors, to facilitate their return to work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.