ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2025
Clinical Significance of Perioperative Minimal Residual Disease Detected by Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With Lung Cancer With a Long Follow-up Data: An Exploratory Study.
Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Residual Disease in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Technology or Patient Outcomes?Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Perioperative EGFR-Targeted Therapy in Resectable EGFR-Mutated NSCLC: A Narrative Review from Drug Design to Pain-Informed MRD-Guided Care.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Prognostic value of preoperative inflammatory markers in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a multi-center retrospective study based on logistic regression and machine learning techniques.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Circulating tumor DNA in neoadjuvant therapy for solid tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Direct Comparison of Tumor-Informed and Tumor-Naive Circulating Tumor DNA Assays for Recurrence Detection in Early-Stage NSCLC.JTO clinical and research reports · 2026Article
- Molecular minimal residual disease in resected non-small cell lung cancer: "flattening the curve".Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Molecular residual disease detected by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been reported to be predictive of patients' outcomes in various types of cancers after curative intent treatment. Nevertheless, additional detailed information regarding the association of longitudinal ctDNA detection with long-term follow-up in lung cancer is needed. Here, we report on a cohort of patients with NSCLC who underwent definitive surgery and ctDNA analysis in the pre-operative, adjuvant, and surveillance settings. Method: Plasma samples were collected from 46 patients with clinical stage II-III NSCLC before surgery (n = 46), after surgery (n = 45), and every six months until two years thereafter (n = 78). A clinically validated, personalized, tumor-informed 16-plex polymerase chain reaction-next-generation sequencing assay was used for the detection and quantification of ctDNA in retrospectively analyzed plasma samples. Results: Circulating tumor DNA was detected in the first postoperative (within 51 days after surgery) plasma samples in 13% (6/45) of patients (landmark analysis). All of them had disease recurrence within a median of 9.1 months. These patients had shorter recurrence-free and overall survivals than those without detectable ctDNA at a landmark time point ( Conclusions: The presence of ctDNA post-surgery or during surveillance identifies patients with NSCLC at high risk of recurrence. Serial testing is important to detect disease recurrence earlier (lead-time: 3.2 months).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.