ReviewBrain & spine2025
Advances in chromosomal microarray analysis: Transforming neurology and neurosurgery.
Review in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic services in Pakistan: a review highlighting limitations and opportunities for improvement.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Array comparative genomic hybridisation in haematological malignancies: A comprehensive review.African journal of laboratory medicine · 2026Review
- Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) in Genotoxicology: From the Basics to Modern Approaches.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Types and Diagnosis of Childhood Intellectual Disabilities: Advancing Accuracy for Better Outcomes.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past two decades, genomics has transformed our understanding of various clinical conditions, with Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA) standing out as a key technique. Offering unparalleled sensitivity, CMA detects submicroscopic chromosomal imbalances, enabling the examination of DNA for copy number variations, deletions, duplications, and other structural differences. In neurology, CMA has revolutionised diagnoses, personalised treatment plans, and patient outcomes. By identifying genetic anomalies linked to neurological conditions, CMA allows clinicians to tailor treatments based on individual genetic profiles, enhancing precision medicine. CMA's clinical utility spans numerous neurological conditions, providing crucial insights into neurodevelopmental disorders, CNS tumours, neurodegenerative diseases, cerebrovascular diseases, and epilepsy. In neurodevelopmental disorders, CMA aids in diagnosing autism and intellectual disabilities, facilitating early interventions that improve long-term outcomes. In epilepsy, CMA helps identify genetic causes of drug-resistant seizures, enabling more targeted therapies and reducing adverse reactions. CMA also aids in stratifying risk for cerebrovascular diseases, enabling preventive interventions that improve patient prognosis. Despite its potential, challenges remain, such as interpreting variants of uncertain significance (VOUS), the lack of standardised testing guidelines, and issues of cost and accessibility. Addressing these challenges will optimise CMA's impact, advancing personalised medicine and reshaping neurology. This review discusses CMA's pivotal role in bridging the gap between genomics and clinical practice, underscoring its potential to transform neurogenetics and ultimately improve patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.