Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39990096›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025

Anticoagulant management of cancer-associated thrombosis and thrombocytopenia: a retrospective chart review.

Umaima Abbas, Robin MacKenzie, Ushra Khan, Rija Fatima, Tzu-Fei Wang, Rong Luo, Caroline Hamm, Andrea Cervi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Direct oral anticoagulants in thrombocytopenic patients with cancer.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026
    Article
  5. Anticoagulant therapy in patients with cancer and thrombocytopenia.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Left Ventricular Thrombus in Oncology Patients and Beyond: Imaging, Treatment Choices, and Duration.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Umaima AbbasDepartment of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Robin MacKenzieDepartment of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Ushra KhanDepartment of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Rija FatimaDepartment of Translational Health Science, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada.
Tzu-Fei WangDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa at The Ottawa Hospital and Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Rong LuoDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Leddy Library, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada.
Caroline HammDepartment of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Andrea CerviDepartment of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) are at an increased risk of recurrent thrombosis and bleeding, especially if there is treatment- or disease-related thrombocytopenia. While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are used in the management of CAT, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) continues to be recommended for CAT with thrombocytopenia. Objectives: This study aimed to identify the rates of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding in patients with CAT and thrombocytopenia treated with DOACs compared with LMWH. Methods: A retrospective review of patients with CAT and thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100,000/μL) was conducted. Primary outcomes included rates of recurrent VTE and major bleeding over 90 days. Results: Forty-two patients met the inclusion criteria; 20 (47.6%) had a solid organ malignancy while 22 (52.4%) had a hematologic malignancy. Within the first 7 days of VTE, 3 (7.1%) patients had a platelet count <25,000/μL, 9 (21.4%) had 25,000 to 50,000/μL, and 19 (45.2%) had 50,000 to 100,000/μL. Sixteen patients (38.1%) received a DOAC for initial treatment, while 19 (45.2%) received LMWH. Among patients treated with DOACs, there were no recurrent VTEs, 2 clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events (12.5%) within the first 2 weeks, and 1 minor bleed (6.3%) in the second month, while those treated with LMWH had 1 recurrent VTE (5.3%) in the second month and 2 clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events (10.5%) within the first 2 months. Conclusion: Rates of thrombosis and major bleeding were similar among thrombocytopenic patients with CAT treated with DOACs and LMWH, although differences in baseline patient characteristics can be confounders. Further prospective research on the optimal anticoagulant management of CAT with thrombocytopenia is needed.

Indexed as

direct oral anticoagulanthemorrhageneoplasmsthrombocytopeniavenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID39990096
PMCPMC11847241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.