ArticleInternational journal of developmental disabilities2025
Computer and tablet assessments of executive function in youth with Down syndrome: feasibility and predictors of performance.
Article in International journal of developmental disabilities, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tablet Assessment of Cognition in Down Syndrome: Comparison of Researcher and Caregiver Administration.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Feasibility of direct assessments is at the forefront of preparation for future clinical trials targeting cognition and executive functioning for individuals with Down syndrome (DS). This study aimed to assess feasibility and predictors of task completion for computer-facilitated executive function assessments in youth with DS. Methods: Participants were 77 individuals with DS 6 to 19 years old. Five computer/tablet-based assessments of executive function were administered. Overall cognitive abilities were directly assessed, and caregivers reported on adaptive behaviours. Results: Feasibility of the measures ranged from 33.8 - 75.3%. Participants able to complete each computer/tablet assessment were generally older and had higher adaptive skill levels and higher cognitive abilities compared to those who could not complete the tasks. Chronological age and adaptive behaviours emerged as significant unique contributors to variance of computer/tablet assessment completion. Conclusion: Understanding developmental skills that support computer-facilitated assessment completion is important for evaluating the appropriateness of these assessments in individuals with DS. Strategies for increasing feasibility and suggestions for modifications to computer/tablet assessments are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.