Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39990087›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of developmental disabilities2025

Computer and tablet assessments of executive function in youth with Down syndrome: feasibility and predictors of performance.

Emily K Schworer, Anna J Esbensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of developmental disabilities, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emily K SchworerWaisman Center, University of WI Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Anna J EsbensenDivision of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Funding

Waisman Center Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research CenterP50HD105353 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Qiang Chang · 2021 to 2026
$8.5M
INCLUDE19 – Evaluating outcome measures in young adults with Down syndromeR01HD093754 · NICHD · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI Anna J. Esbensen · 2018 to 2026
$6.2M
POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING IN MENTAL RETARDATION RESEARCHT32HD007489 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Sigan L Hartley · 1995 to 2026
$6.0M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD105353NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD093754NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007489
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Feasibility of direct assessments is at the forefront of preparation for future clinical trials targeting cognition and executive functioning for individuals with Down syndrome (DS). This study aimed to assess feasibility and predictors of task completion for computer-facilitated executive function assessments in youth with DS. Methods: Participants were 77 individuals with DS 6 to 19 years old. Five computer/tablet-based assessments of executive function were administered. Overall cognitive abilities were directly assessed, and caregivers reported on adaptive behaviours. Results: Feasibility of the measures ranged from 33.8 - 75.3%. Participants able to complete each computer/tablet assessment were generally older and had higher adaptive skill levels and higher cognitive abilities compared to those who could not complete the tasks. Chronological age and adaptive behaviours emerged as significant unique contributors to variance of computer/tablet assessment completion. Conclusion: Understanding developmental skills that support computer-facilitated assessment completion is important for evaluating the appropriateness of these assessments in individuals with DS. Strategies for increasing feasibility and suggestions for modifications to computer/tablet assessments are discussed.

Indexed as

cognitiondown syndromeexecutive functionfeasibilityoutcome measurestrisomy 21

Identifiers

PMID39990087
PMCPMC11843650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.