Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39990081›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of developmental disabilities2025

Attitudes toward people with intellectual disabilities in Norway.

Stian Orm, Celina Blikstad-Blumenthal, Krister Fjermestad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of developmental disabilities, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stian OrmDivision of Mental Health, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Brumunddal, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4932-8264
Celina Blikstad-BlumenthalDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Krister FjermestadFrambu Resource Center for Rare Disorders, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7501-0033

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We investigated attitudes toward individuals with an intellectual disability (ID) in a Norwegian sample and tested the psychometric properties of a Norwegian translation of the Community Living Attitudes Scale - Intellectual Disability (CLAS-ID). Method: The sample was 645 adults ( Results: The four-factor structure of the CLAS-ID showed good model fit in a confirmatory factor analysis of the Norwegian translation with adequate internal consistency. Participants with working experience with ID or a family member with ID reported more favorable attitudes compared with participants without working experience or without a family member with ID, respectively. Women and older participants reported more positive attitudes compared to men and younger participants. Conclusion: The Norwegian translation of the CLAS-ID appears to be a valid tool for assessing attitudes toward individuals with an ID. Individuals with first-hand experience with individuals with an ID have more positive attitudes than those without, and women and older people have more positive attitudes than men and younger people.

Indexed as

attitudesfactor analysisintellectual disabilitypsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID39990081
PMCPMC11843632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.