ReviewAsian journal of urology2025
Factors affecting the thermal effects of lasers in lithotripsy: A literature review.
Review in Asian journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- An in-vitro comparative study of magneto holmium: YAG and fiber dust thulium fiber lasers-primary effects on ablation, retropulsion, fragmentation, and temperature changes using phantom urologic stones.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Optimization of Thulium Fiber Laser Lithotripsy Efficacy Based on Multidimensional Parameter Combination Strategies.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Complications following repeated ureteroscopy for UTUC: The price to pay for nephron-sparing surgery.BJU international · 2026Article
- Fundamental Limitation: How Through-Thickness Heterogeneity in Laser-Reduced Graphene Oxide Compromises Sensor Stability.ACS applied nano materials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The use of lasers has been an important part of urology in the treatment of stone and prostate disease. The thermal effects of lasers in lithotripsy have been a subject of debate over the years. The objective of this review was to assess the current state of knowledge available on the thermal effects of lasers in lithotripsy, as well as explore any new areas where studies are needed. Methods: In August 2022, a keyword search on Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus for all papers containing the phrases "thermal effects" AND "laser" AND "lithotripsy" AND "urology" was done followed by citation jumping to other studies pertaining to the topic and 35 relevant papers were included in our study. The data from relevant papers were segregated into five groups according to the factor studied and type of study, and tables were created for a comparison of data. Results: Temperature above the threshold of 43 °C was reached only when the power was >40 W and when there was adequate irrigation (at least 15-30 mL/min). Shorter lasing time divided by lithotripsy time or operator duty cycles less than 70% also resulted in a smaller temperature rise. Conclusion: At least eight factors modify the thermal effects of lasers, and most importantly, the use of chilled irrigation at higher perfusion rates, lower power settings of <40 W, and with a shorter operator duty cycle will help to prevent thermal injuries from occurring. Stones impacted in the ureter or pelvi-ureteric junction further increase the probability of thermal injuries during laser firing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.