ArticleAsian journal of urology2025
Clinical outcomes of intravenous urography-assisted shockwave lithotripsy for radiolucent ureteral stones.
Article in Asian journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of intravenous urography-assisted fluoroscopy-guided shockwave lithotripsy for radiolucent ureteral stones and standard shockwave lithotripsy for radiopaque ureteral stones. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 734 patients with ureteral stones treated by fluoroscopy-guided shockwave lithotripsy between March 2014 and March 2021. The primary outcome was a stone-free rate with one session within 30 days, defined as no residual stones without auxiliary treatment. The multivariate analysis was used to examine whether the intravenous urography use predicted treatment success. Furthermore, we compared the outcomes using propensity score matching. Results: Ninety-eight patients underwent the intravenous urography use protocol (Group I), and the remaining 636 patients underwent the non-intravenous urography protocol (Group N). Stone-free rates with one session within 30 days were 38% and 32% in groups I and N, respectively ( Conclusion: Radiolucent stones can be safely and effectively treated by shockwave lithotripsy with intravenous urography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.