Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39990063›Full record

ArticleSSM. Qualitative research in health2024

Reflections on the Collaborative Story Analysis Method to Understand Qualitative Perspectives of Indigenous Syringe Services Program Clients.

Alexandra K Perron, Brenna Greenfield, Atasha Brown, Frank Johnson, Toni Napier, Jordan Stipek, Aanji’bide Community Action Board, Jennifer J Mootz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM. Qualitative research in health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexandra K PerronUniversity of Minnesota Medical School, Duluth Campus, 1035 University Dr, Duluth, MN, 55812, USA.
Brenna GreenfieldUniversity of Minnesota Medical School, Duluth Campus, 1035 University Dr, Duluth, MN, 55812, USA.
Atasha BrownTribal Partner, MN, USA.
Frank JohnsonTribal Partner, MN, USA.
Toni NapierTribal Partner, MN, USA.
Jordan StipekUniversity of Minnesota Medical School, Duluth Campus, 1035 University Dr, Duluth, MN, 55812, USA.
Aanji’bide Community Action Board
Jennifer J MootzColumbia University Department of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Dr, NY, 10032, USA.

Funding

Changing our paths: Well-being and recovery among American Indians with opioid use disorderR33DA049386 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI GREENFIELD, BRENNA · 2022 to 2024
$2.2M
Changing our paths: Well-being and recovery among American Indians with opioid use disorderR61DA049386 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI GREENFIELD, BRENNA · 2019 to 2020
$1.5M
NIDA NIH HHS R33 DA049386NIDA NIH HHS R61 DA049386
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many scholars have cautioned that the use of Western research methods is problematic in studies with Indigenous communities given colonialist histories that have exploited Indigenous populations. One solution has been to utilize a Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) approach to enhance equity in research partnerships. Employing a CBPR approach, however, does not necessitate the inclusion of Indigenous Research Methods, an additional step that can further benefit studies with their explicit alignment with Indigenous worldviews and values. In a CBPR project aiming to understand Indigenous harm reduction clients' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to opioid use disorder treatment, our research group assembled a multidisciplinary qualitative data analysis team that included diverse tribal community members and academics. Sparse literature was available to guide the use of Indigenous Research Methods for the qualitative data analysis phase of the research. To address this gap, the aims of this process paper are: (1) to describe the implementation of the Collaborative Story Analysis method, and (2) in the Indigenous tradition of honoring and sharing stories, describe our analysis team's experiences and perceptions of implementing this Indigenous Research Method. Through a series of process discussions, the analysis team found that applying the Collaborative Story Analysis method: (1) honored relationships and story, (2) strengthened the depth of analysis, and (3) exhibited tensions when working in a dominant Western culture. Through sharing our team's experiences, the aspiration is that others can use these insights in their own consideration and implementation of an Indigenous Research Method for qualitative data analysis.

Indexed as

CBPRCollaborative Story AnalysisIndigenousQualitative analysisStoriesStorytelling

Identifiers

PMID39990063
PMCPMC11845235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.