Among Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Methods, Automated Gradient-Boosting Models Accurately Score Intraoral Plaque in Non-Standardized Images.

Background: Previous automated models inaccurately scored non-standardized plaque images. The objectives were to develop and test automated image selection and intraoral plaque-scoring (primary outcome measure in a prevention trial for preschoolers). Methods: Evaluating 1650 plaque-disclosed primary teeth (teeth D, E, F, G) from 435 photographs from UCSF/UCLA clinical trials, data were cleaned, transformed, and modeled with statistical and machine learning (ML) algorithms; data visualizations utilized Jupyter Notebooks, Python, OpenCV, and Sci-kit Learn libraries, with Laplacian filter preprocessing. Image selection and plaque-scoring used 8 ML classification models. Mean plaque-scoring used 8 ML regression models. Models were tuned with 80:20 train:test split, stratified 5-fold cross-validation (5-CV) (unstratified in regression models), and hyperparameter optimization. Area-under-the-curve receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) curve and R Results: Best performing models were: Support Vector Machine-Gaussian for image selection, 5-CV AUC-ROC of 0.99 and 0.76s of training time; Gradient-Boosting classification and regression models for individual teeth (5-CV AUC-ROC of 0.99 with 105s training); and mean plaque-scoring algorithms (5-CV R Conclusions: Accurate automated plaque-scoring is attainable without the high computational and financial costs of deep learning (DL) models. Automated plaque-scoring is attainable with little user-manipulation. Practical Implications: Implementing automated tooth segmentation and synthetic sample generation with DL training may strengthen reliability, validity, and efficiency for clinical, research, and teledentistry applications by eliminating manual image preprocessing.