ArticleNature and science of sleep2025
A Comparative Investigation on Clinical Characteristics in Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea Based on Two Distinct Guidelines.
Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the differences in assessment of clinical characteristics between children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) diagnosed according to the 2007 and 2020 guidelines and those without OSA, together with the relationships between polysomnography (PSG) parameters and cognitive tests scores in preschool and school-aged children with OSA. Methods: Eighty children were totally recruited and divided into OSA and non-OSA groups based on two distinct guidelines, with further subclassification into preschool and school-aged subgroups. Differences in PSG parameters and cognitive tests scores between groups and subgroups were analyzed and compared, followed by partial correlation analysis to determine the correlations between these characteristics. Results: Compared to the 2007 guideline, the 2020 guideline demonstrated more significant between-group differences in clinical characteristics assessments, especially verbal intelligent quotient (VIQ). For preschool children in the OSA and non-OSA subgroups, there were significant differences in PSG parameters and Block Diagram between the two guidelines. Additionally, the 2007 guideline showed difference in Picture Vocabulary, where the 2020 guideline exhibited differences in performance IQ (PIQ) and Geometric Figure For school-aged children in the OSA and non-OSA subgroups, both guidelines showed significant differences in PSG parameters, full-scale IQ (FIQ) and Block Diagram. The 2007 guideline had significant differences in PIQ, while the 2020 guideline had difference in VIQ. Furthermore, significant correlations were observed between PSG parameters and cognitive tests scores across different subgroups. Conclusion: The 2020 guideline has advantages in assessing the clinical characteristics of children with OSA, especially for verbal function, and is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.