ArticleProceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)2025
Differences in Medicare payment and practice characteristics for orthopedic surgery subspecialties.
Article in Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intelligence Architectures and Machine Learning Applications in Contemporary Spine Care.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Medicare payment, practice, and patient characteristics give perspective on the lifestyle, challenges, and attractiveness unique to each orthopedic surgery subspecialty. Changes to Medicare reimbursement may also affect health care delivery, warranting policy change. We analyzed differences in orthopedic surgery subspecialty characteristics and Medicare payments. Methods: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data set was filtered by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes unique to each orthopedic surgery subspecialty in 2019. After filtering by unique CPT codes, 100 randomized physicians were validated for each subspecialty: adult reconstruction and arthroplasty, trauma, sports medicine, hand surgery, shoulder and elbow surgery, foot and ankle surgery, and spine surgery. Data gathered included unique procedural codes, number of beneficiaries, services provided, and the total Medicare allowed amount. Differences were assessed with post hoc tests. Subspecialty changes in Medicare payment were assessed using the Physician Fee Schedule and compared using a single-factor analysis of variance. Results: On average, hand surgery recorded the most unique CPT codes (106) and the highest volume of beneficiaries (571). Adult reconstruction and arthroplasty had the fewest unique codes (60) and the greatest total Medicare payment ($328,000). Spine surgery had the lowest number of beneficiaries (387) and lowest number of services provided (1752). Lastly, sports medicine provided the largest volume of services (4221). Mean total codes, unique codes, and total patients differed between subspecialties. Varying differences in average Medicare payment, total billed codes, total unique codes, total patients, patient race, patient age, patient sex, and patient health were found for all orthopedic surgery subspecialties in 2019. Conclusions: These data may illustrate financial incentives for orthopedic surgery residents to pursue certain subspecialties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.