Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39989997›Full record

ArticleProceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)2025

Effect of intracervical block on self-reported intrauterine device insertion pain: a single-center prospective survey study.

Micah Clay, Joyce Ku, Krystal N Fett, Michael P Hofkamp, Joanna K Stacey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Micah ClayDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple, Temple, Texas, USA.
Joyce KuTexas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine, College Station, Texas, USA.
Krystal N FettDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple, Temple, Texas, USA.
Michael P HofkampDepartment of Anesthesiology, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple, Temple, Texas, USA.
Joanna K StaceyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple, Temple, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2904-0415

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to determine the incidence of self-reported pain during office-based intrauterine device (IUD) placement. Methods: The study included patients who had IUD placement at our clinic from April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024 with no prior history of vaginal delivery, who were between the ages of 14 and 48 years, did not have cervicitis, and were not pregnant. Informed consent was obtained, a prequestionnaire was completed, the IUD was placed in accordance with clinician preference, and a postquestionnaire was administered. Results: Thirty-seven patients answered the question about expected pain. Two (5%) reported that their pain during IUD placement was none, 22 (59%) reported that pain was better than expected, 10 (27%) reported that pain was just as bad as expected, two (5%) reported pain was worse than expected, and one (3%) indicated that their pain during IUD placement was much worse than expected. Thirty-three patients received an intracervical or paracervical block, and five patients did not receive an intracervical or paracervical block; these groups reported visual analog pain scores of 35 ± 25 mm and 58 ± 14 mm, respectively ( Conclusion: Approximately 8% of patients in our study reported worse or much worse than expected pain with IUD placement. Patients who received an intracervical or paracervical block reported less pain, but this difference was not statistically significant. Paracervical or intracervical blocks can decrease perceived pain with IUD insertion, increasing contraceptive options for those who are concerned about painful insertions; however larger studies are needed.

Indexed as

Analgesiacatastrophizingintrauterine devicepain

Identifiers

PMID39989997
PMCPMC11844926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.