Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39989981›Full record

ReviewToxicology reports2025

Antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia: Toxicologic mechanism and the increased breast cancer risk.

Steven B Bird

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxicology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Steven B BirdUMass Chan Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA 01545, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antipsychotic drugs are effective at improving both the positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia as well as the manic phase of bipolar disorder. Whether an antipsychotic is termed typical or atypical is related to the xenobiotic's propensity to cause extrapyramidal side effects. However, with a few exceptions, drugs of both classes of antipsychotics are known to cause hyperprolactinemia. As many breast cancers are responsive to prolactin concentrations, the persistent increase in prolactin of the antipsychotics has implications for public health and carcinogenesis. The objective of this study was to review the extant literature on hyperprolactinemia due to antipsychotics, and to determine the risk imposed by those drugs on human breast cancer. A summary risk of breast cancer with use of any antipsychotic was found to be 1.19 (95 % confidence interval 1.10-1.30). When limiting usage of antipsychotics to 5 or more years, the summary risk increased to 1.26 (95 % confidence interval 1.12-1.43). And when limited to those studies who evaluated only those medications with the greatest increase in prolactin, the risk increased to 1.59 (95 % confidence interval 1.37-1.85). Given this increased risk of breast cancer, stronger warnings about this increased risk are warranted, and regular monitoring of prolactin levels and breast cancer screening should be part of the management plan for these patients.

Indexed as

AntipsychoticBipolar disorderBreast cancerNeurolepticProlactinSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID39989981
PMCPMC11846583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.