Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39989955›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

Air sampling accurately captures circulating zoonotic viral diversity emerging from poultry live-animal markets.

Peter Cronin, Jurre Siegers, Vireak Heang, Songha Tok, Sarath Sin, Benjamin Sievers, Victor Omondi, Sithun Nuon, Kimtuo Chhel, Janin Nouhin and 10 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Peter CroninProgramme in Emerging Infectious Diseases, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore.
Jurre SiegersInstitut Pasteur du Cambodge.
Vireak HeangVirology Unit, Institute Pasteur du Cambodge, Pasteur Network, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Songha TokVirology Unit, Institute Pasteur du Cambodge, Pasteur Network, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Sarath SinVirology Unit, Institute Pasteur du Cambodge, Pasteur Network, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Benjamin SieversJ. Craig Venter Institute.
Victor OmondiVirology Unit, Institute Pasteur du Cambodge, Pasteur Network, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Sithun NuonVirology Unit, Institute Pasteur du Cambodge, Pasteur Network, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Kimtuo ChhelVirology Unit, Institute Pasteur du Cambodge, Pasteur Network, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Janin NouhinInstitut Pasteur in Cambodia.ORCID 0000-0003-4985-8377
Vutha ChimNational Animal Health and Production Institute, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Bunnary SengNational Animal Health and Production Institute, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Makara HakFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Emergency Center for Transboundary Animal Diseases, Country Office, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Sorn SanNational Animal Health and Production Institute, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Sothyra TumNational Animal Health and Production Institute, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Filip ClaesFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Emergency Center for Transboundary Animal Diseases, Regional Office for Asia Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand.
Cadhla FirthCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Yvonne SuDuke-NUS Medical School.ORCID 0000-0003-4349-9211
Gavin SmithDuke-NUS Medical School.ORCID 0000-0001-5031-468X
Erik KarlssonInstitut Pasteur du Cambodge.ORCID 0000-0001-6004-5671

Funding

Emerging Infectious Diseases Research Centers Coordination Center (EIDRC CC)U01AI151378 · NIAID · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI Gregory D Sempowski · 2020 to 2026
$14.7M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI151378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental surveillance has emerged as a pivotal strategy for early detection of pathogens that pose threats to humans (1) but has not been utilized for zoonotic agents. In Asia, live-bird markets (LBMs) are key human-animal interfaces for zoonotic virus transmission (2). Traditional sampling strategies are time-consuming, expensive, threaten animal welfare and have significant occupational biosafety risks. In this study, we assessed the performance of metagenomics on environmental samples (ES) compared to traditional poultry swabs for detecting avian viral pathogens in LBMs in Cambodia. ES, including air, cage swabs, and carcass wash water, were collected alongside throat and cloacal swabs from domestic chickens and ducks across twelve sampling visits in two LBMs over a 15-month period. Viral nucleic acids were extracted and sequenced using a capture probe-based metagenomics approach. Our results show that metagenomics on ES outperformed traditional poultry samples in detecting the highly pathogenic Influenza A/H5N1, including circulating clades 2.3.4.4b and 2.3.2.1c, which were found in the environment but missed by poultry swabs on multiple occasions. Environmental metagenomics was also highly sensitive in the detection of over 40 other viruses from key pathogen families such as

Identifiers

PMID39989955
PMCPMC11844658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.