ArticleACS photonics2025
Direct on-Chip Optical Communication between Nano Optoelectronic Devices.
Article in ACS photonics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanoscale photonic artificial neuron with biological signal processing.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Neural network connectivity by optical broadcasting between III-V nanowires.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
On-chip optical communication between individual nano optoelectronic components is important to reduce the footprint and improve energy efficiency of photonic neuromorphic solutions. Although nanoscale photon emitters and receivers have been reported separately, communication between them remains largely unexplored. We demonstrate direct on-chip directional broadcasting of light between individual InP nanowire photodiodes on silicon. The performance of multiple wire-to-wire communication circuits is mapped, demonstrating robust performance with up to 5 bit resolution as needed in biological networks and a minimum component driving power for continuous operation of 0.5 μW which is below that of conventional hardware. The results agree well with theoretical modeling that allows us to understand network performance limits and identify where significant improvements could be achieved. We estimate that an energy per operation of ∼1 fJ and signal fan-out from one emitter to hundreds of other nodes is possible. We find that the nanowire circuit performance parameters can satisfy the quantitative requirements to run the tasks of neural nodes in a bioderived neural network for autonomous navigation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.