ArticleHealth systems (Basingstoke, England)2025
Application of a composite, multi-scale COVID-19 mitigation framework: US border use-case.
Article in Health systems (Basingstoke, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Airborne pathogen transmission within crowded facilities can be modelled by combining several interrelated mechanisms of spread: movement of people, airflow dynamics, and aerosol dispersion. This paper describes a composite model framework combining analytical models to demonstrate the spread of an airborne pathogen in a crowded, confined space at an immigrant processing centre on the southern US border during the border crisis of March 2021. Recommendations that could reduce current COVID-19 infection rate from 11% to 6.16% at relatively low additional cost to the government are given. These recommendations could also lower the infection rate by approximately five times from 31.14% worst case from long indoor exposures down to 6.35% when immigrant processing times surge to 10 days. This work highlights the challenges of managing COVID-19 in crowded facilities, and provides quantitative decision options with potential both to slow and prevent disease spread, while lessening the economic burden on communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.