Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39989870›Full record

ArticleWomen's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2025

How and What Do Women Learn About Contraception? A Latent Class Analysis of Adolescents and Adult Women in Delaware.

Mónica L Caudillo, Fatima Zahra, Michael S Rendall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mónica L CaudilloDepartment of Sociology and Maryland Population Research Center, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Fatima ZahraGIRL Center, Population Council, Washington, DC, USA.
Michael S RendallDepartment of Sociology and Maryland Population Research Center, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.

Funding

Sci-Tech Core-Maryland Population Research CenterP2CHD041041 · NICHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI Susan W Parker · 2018 to 2026
$3.9M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Across the reproductive life course, women receive information about contraception that may influence their contraceptive behaviors. This study examines the information sources that adolescents and older women combine to acquire information about contraception. Methods: A state-representative survey of women aged 18-44 residing in Delaware, US, in 2017 asked from what sources respondents recently learned about contraception and the type of information obtained. The 2017 Delaware Youth Risk Behavior Survey, representative of public high school students aged 14-18, included analogous questions. Latent class analysis was applied to classify respondents in both samples of adolescents ( Results: Adolescents are more likely than adults to report having recently acquired any information about contraception (76% vs. 64%), but they are more likely to rely primarily on a single source. In contrast, adult women are more likely to combine multiple sources. Age, education, and sexual activity emerged as important predictors of information source repertoires. Adults who combine information sources and adolescents who learn mainly from health care providers or school personnel report the greatest breadth in the contraception-related information acquired. Conclusion: Interventions to provide or improve contraceptive knowledge may be more effective if they account for how women use and combine information sources, particularly at different stages of their reproductive lives.

Indexed as

adolescentsadult womencontraceptioncontraceptive educationcontraceptive informationreproductive age

Identifiers

PMID39989870
PMCPMC11839519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.