ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2025
Endoscopic removal of an embedded chicken bone in the esophagus: A case report.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Successful Removal of a Postprandially Ingested Metallic Compass Tip via Gastric Lavage-Assisted Endoscopy: A Paediatric Case Report.Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSharp foreign body ingestion can cause gastrointestinal tract mucosa injury and requires proper endoscopic removal. Typically, protective devices are used to reduce mucosal damage. This case presents an alternative approach for the endoscopic removal of a large, irregular, and sharp foreign body (chicken bone) when traditional protective devices are inadequate, thus contributing to the management of such ingestions. CASE SUMMARY: A 57-year-old male presented with a history of swallowing an irregular and sharp-pointed chicken bone. Emergent endoscopy showed it was tightly embedded in the esophageal wall, with minor bleeding. The chicken bone was grasped and moved cautiously using a foreign forceps. It was loosened after repeated attempts but could not pass through the pharynx. Considering possible mucosal damage, it was carefully pushed into the stomach cavity and then wrapped in a condom. The chicken bone was retrieved uneventfully by grasping the open edge of the condom with foreign forceps. No additional damage was found, except for primary esophageal injuries caused by the embedded chicken bone. The patient was discharged on the following day. Our experience demonstrated that condoms can be an alternative as a protective device under such conditions.
conclusionCondoms can serve as an alternative when traditional protective devices are unsuitable. Because of its smooth and oily nature, it can provide mucosal protection and lubrication during endoscopic removal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.