ArticleACS omega2025
Viscosity and Thermal Conductivity Models of 151 Common Fluids Based on Residual Entropy Scaling and Cubic Equations of State.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A residual entropy scaling (RES) approach combined with the cubic equation of state (EoS) was developed to calculate the viscosity and thermal conductivity of 151 common fluids. These pure fluids are all the pure fluids available in the NIST's REFPROP 10.0 database. Seven cubic EoS were studied, while only four yielded good and similar results; these are Peng-Robinson (PR), Soave-Redlich-Kwong (SRK), Patel-Teja-Valderrama (PTV), and Yang-Frotscher-Richter (YFR) EoS. The parameters of a pure fluid in this cubic EoS + RES approach were fitted using experimental data if they are available in the NIST ThermoData Engine database 10.1, otherwise, using the calculations of REFPROP 10.0. This approach is applicable in the entire temperature and pressure ranges for thermal conductivity and at pressures lower than 60 MPa for viscosity. Using this approach, the average absolute value of the relative deviation (AARD) of all of the analyzable experimental values from model calculations was approximately 3.1% and 3.6% for viscosity and thermal conductivity, respectively. This result is not too bad compared to 2.7% and 2.5% obtained by the state-of-the-art viscosity and thermal conductivity models in REFPROP 10.0. The key advantage of this approach is that it has a much simpler equation form and can be easily extended to more fluids. The developed approach has been implemented in the OilMixProp 1.0 software package, and this work will be a basis for the future development of more than 600 pure fluids.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.