Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39989818›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Viscosity and Thermal Conductivity Models of 151 Common Fluids Based on Residual Entropy Scaling and Cubic Equations of State.

Xiaoxian Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Xiaoxian YangApplied Thermodynamics, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz 09107, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4655-3156

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A residual entropy scaling (RES) approach combined with the cubic equation of state (EoS) was developed to calculate the viscosity and thermal conductivity of 151 common fluids. These pure fluids are all the pure fluids available in the NIST's REFPROP 10.0 database. Seven cubic EoS were studied, while only four yielded good and similar results; these are Peng-Robinson (PR), Soave-Redlich-Kwong (SRK), Patel-Teja-Valderrama (PTV), and Yang-Frotscher-Richter (YFR) EoS. The parameters of a pure fluid in this cubic EoS + RES approach were fitted using experimental data if they are available in the NIST ThermoData Engine database 10.1, otherwise, using the calculations of REFPROP 10.0. This approach is applicable in the entire temperature and pressure ranges for thermal conductivity and at pressures lower than 60 MPa for viscosity. Using this approach, the average absolute value of the relative deviation (AARD) of all of the analyzable experimental values from model calculations was approximately 3.1% and 3.6% for viscosity and thermal conductivity, respectively. This result is not too bad compared to 2.7% and 2.5% obtained by the state-of-the-art viscosity and thermal conductivity models in REFPROP 10.0. The key advantage of this approach is that it has a much simpler equation form and can be easily extended to more fluids. The developed approach has been implemented in the OilMixProp 1.0 software package, and this work will be a basis for the future development of more than 600 pure fluids.

Identifiers

PMID39989818
PMCPMC11840589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.