Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39989812›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Gradient Retention Time Modeling in Ion Chromatography through Ensemble Machine Learning-Powered Quantitative Structure-Retention Relationships.

Zhen Jia Lim, Petar Žuvela, Šime Ukić, Mirjana Novak Stankov, Tomislav Bolanča, Mario Lovrić, Ming Wah Wong, Bogusław Buszewski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhen Jia LimDepartment of Chemistry, National University of Singapore, 3 Science Drive 3, Singapore 117543, Singapore.
Petar ŽuvelaDepartment of Chemistry, National University of Singapore, 3 Science Drive 3, Singapore 117543, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6481-2241
Šime UkićDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, University of Zagreb, Marulićev trg 19, Zagreb 10000, Croatia.
Mirjana Novak StankovDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, University of Zagreb, Marulićev trg 19, Zagreb 10000, Croatia.
Tomislav BolančaDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, University of Zagreb, Marulićev trg 19, Zagreb 10000, Croatia.
Mario LovrićCentre for Applied Bioanthropology, Institute for Anthropological Research, Zagreb 10000, Croatia.
Ming Wah WongDepartment of Chemistry, National University of Singapore, 3 Science Drive 3, Singapore 117543, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2162-1220
Bogusław BuszewskiDepartment of Environmental Chemistry and Bioanalytics, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Gagarina 7 St., Toruń 87-100, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative structure-retention relationships (QSRRs) have been a popular modeling approach in ion chromatography to predict retention time from molecular structures. It is often coupled with solvent strength models to extend it to other isocratic chromatographic conditions. While this approach has achieved reasonable success, potential inconsistencies from the solvent strength model may propagate to the QSRR models, thereby amplifying their errors. In this work, we aim to incorporate information on the isocratic conditions directly into the QSRR model to reduce error propagation and build global models. Four machine learning approaches that can account for both global and local sources of variability in chromatographic retention, random forest regression, gradient boosting regression (GBR), extreme gradient boosting (xgBoost), and adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), were evaluated and compared. The partial least-squares model was built as a baseline to compare against. GBR and xgBoost have shown superior predictive ability among the evaluated models with root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) of isocratic retention of 0.025 (+0.009, -0.006) and 0.025 (+0.008, -0.006), respectively. Developed QSRR models were further incorporated into the isocratic-to-gradient model to predict gradient retention. GBR and xgBoost QSRR models have outperformed the other models with RMSEs of gradient retention of 0.358 (+0.199, -0.107) and 0.385 (+0.387, -0.139) min, respectively. Such an approach demonstrates the benefits of incorporating the eluent composition into prediction models, with the potential to extend to other chromatographic techniques.

Identifiers

PMID39989812
PMCPMC11840597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.