Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39989797›Full record

ReviewACS omega2025

Research Progress and Prospects of Nano Plugging Agents for Shale Water-Based Drilling Fluids.

Xiangjun Liu, Yurong Xiao, Yi Ding

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiangjun LiuState Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0633-0989
Yurong XiaoState Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2337-4318
Yi DingState Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3572-2727

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maintaining wellbore stability is one of the most critical technical issues in drilling operations. The shale stratigraphy is characterized by the development of laminations, microfractures, and nano/micrometer pores. Water intrusion accelerates the shale swelling, reduces the intergranular bonding force, and increases the risk of wellbore instability. Effective plugging of drilling fluid intrusion channels is a prominent way to accomplish the wellbore stability. Nanoparticles have the advantages of small size, large specific surface area, and matching of the shale pore size. Therefore, it can be used as a shale nanoplugging agent. This paper summarizes the types of nanoplugging agents, evaluation methods, and mechanisms for existing shale water-based drilling fluids (WBDFs) nanoplugging agents. To meet the plugging requirements of shale formations and accommodate increasingly complex drilling environments, the developement of novel stimuli-responsive nanomaterials that are smaller in size, have better dispersion stability, and possess the ability to leverage high temperature to enhance interactions is essential. It is a significant direction for nanosealing in shale WBDFs. However, all of this should be predicated on reasonable and reliable evaluation methods.

Identifiers

PMID39989797
PMCPMC11840591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.