ArticleACS omega2025
Greenhouse Gas Mass-Balance in Conventional Activated Sludge Wastewater Treatment: A Case Study in Mexico for Developing Countries.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While numerous studies report methane emissions from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in developed countries, few address emissions from plants in developing countries, where outdated technologies, such as the lack of enhanced primary and sludge treatment, are common. Moreover, these studies often rely on indirect calculations rather than direct measurements. Our study fills this gap by providing unit-process-level direct measurements of methane emissions in a conventional WWTP in Mexico, serving as a case study for developing countries. A standard plant was selected and visited on five occasions. It includes a primary settler, an aerated reactor, and a secondary settler, with no sludge treatment in place. Our findings revealed a CH
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.