ArticleACS omega2025
PAPreC: A Pipeline for Antigenicity Prediction Comparison Methods across Bacteria.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- PU-GRAIL: residue-level graph learning for identifying protective bacterial antigens under positive-unlabeled supervision.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- In Silico Design and Evaluation of TcGAPDH as a Vaccine Against Chagas Disease: A Reverse Vaccinology Approach.Acta parasitologica · 2026Article
- Overcoming Immune Evasion inACS infectious diseases · 2025Review
- Purification, identification, andFrontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antigenicity prediction plays a crucial role in vaccine development, antibody-based therapies, and diagnostic assays, as this predictive approach helps assess the potential of molecular structures to induce and recruit immune cells and drive antibody production. Several existing prediction methods, which target complete proteins and epitopes identified through reverse vaccinology, face limitations regarding input data constraints, feature extraction strategies, and insufficient flexibility for model evaluation and interpretation. This work presents PAPreC (Pipeline for Antigenicity Prediction Comparison), an open-source, versatile workflow (available at https://github.com/YasCoMa/paprec_nx_workflow) designed to address these challenges. PAPreC systematically examines three key factors: the selection of training data sets, feature extraction methods (including physicochemical descriptors and ESM-2 encoder-derived embeddings), and diverse classifiers. It provides automated model evaluation, interpretability through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis, and applicability domain assessments, enabling researchers to identify optimal configurations for their specific data sets. Applying PAPreC to IEDB data as a reference, we demonstrate its effectiveness across the ESKAPE pathogen group. A case study involving
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.