Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39989760›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

PAPreC: A Pipeline for Antigenicity Prediction Comparison Methods across Bacteria.

Yasmmin C Martins, Maiana O Cerqueira E Costa, Miranda C Palumbo, Dario F Do Porto, Fábio L Custódio, Raphael Trevizani, Marisa Fabiana Nicolás

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Overcoming Immune Evasion inACS infectious diseases · 2025
    Review
  4. Purification, identification, andFrontiers in nutrition · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yasmmin C MartinsBioinformatics Laboratory, National Laboratory for Scientific Computing, Av. Getúlio Vargas 333, 25651-075 Petrópolis, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6830-1948
Maiana O Cerqueira E CostaBioinformatics Laboratory, National Laboratory for Scientific Computing, Av. Getúlio Vargas 333, 25651-075 Petrópolis, Brazil.
Miranda C PalumboDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, University of Buenos Aires - UBA, Av. Int. Cantilo, C1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Dario F Do PortoDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, University of Buenos Aires - UBA, Av. Int. Cantilo, C1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Fábio L CustódioDepartment of Computational Mechanics, National Laboratory for Scientific Computing, Av. Getúlio Vargas 333, 25651-075 Petrópolis, Brazil.
Raphael TrevizaniBiotechnology, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation - Fiocruz, Street São José S/N, 61760-000 Eusébio, Brazil.
Marisa Fabiana NicolásBioinformatics Laboratory, National Laboratory for Scientific Computing, Av. Getúlio Vargas 333, 25651-075 Petrópolis, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5437-2737

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antigenicity prediction plays a crucial role in vaccine development, antibody-based therapies, and diagnostic assays, as this predictive approach helps assess the potential of molecular structures to induce and recruit immune cells and drive antibody production. Several existing prediction methods, which target complete proteins and epitopes identified through reverse vaccinology, face limitations regarding input data constraints, feature extraction strategies, and insufficient flexibility for model evaluation and interpretation. This work presents PAPreC (Pipeline for Antigenicity Prediction Comparison), an open-source, versatile workflow (available at https://github.com/YasCoMa/paprec_nx_workflow) designed to address these challenges. PAPreC systematically examines three key factors: the selection of training data sets, feature extraction methods (including physicochemical descriptors and ESM-2 encoder-derived embeddings), and diverse classifiers. It provides automated model evaluation, interpretability through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis, and applicability domain assessments, enabling researchers to identify optimal configurations for their specific data sets. Applying PAPreC to IEDB data as a reference, we demonstrate its effectiveness across the ESKAPE pathogen group. A case study involving

Identifiers

PMID39989760
PMCPMC11840615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.