Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39989751›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Changes in bacterial viability after preparation and storage of fecal microbiota transplantation solution using equine feces.

Julia A Arantes, Rebecca Di Pietro, Mélanie Ratté, Luis G Arroyo, Mathilde Leclère, Marcio C Costa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julia A ArantesDepartment of Veterinary Medicine/Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rebecca Di PietroDepartment of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences/Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Montreal, Saint Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.
Mélanie RattéDepartment of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences/Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Montreal, Saint Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.
Luis G ArroyoDepartment of Clinical Studies/Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Mathilde LeclèreDepartment of Clinical Sciences/Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Montreal, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.
Marcio C CostaDepartment of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences/Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Montreal, Saint Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5067-7501

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been used as a treatment option for horses ( Methods: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of oxygen exposure and different protectant solutions on bacterial viability before and after freezing using horse feces. Fecal samples from 10 healthy horses were aliquoted and diluted in cryoprotectant solutions containing antioxidants ( Results: Freeze-thawing decreased bacterial viability by 47% (mean ± SD: 51 ± 27% before, 27 ± 8% after; Conclusions: Fresh FMT solutions may be better for treating horses with dysbiosis, but if freezing cannot be avoided, glycerol should be used to dilute feces.

Indexed as

Fecal Microbiota TransplantationFecesMicrobial ViabilityAnimalsCryopreservationCryoprotective AgentsFreezingGlycerolHorsesOxygenCryoprotective AgentsGlycerolOxygenDiarrheaEquine colitisEquine microbiomeEquine microbiotaFMTFMT preservation

Identifiers

PMID39989751
PMCPMC11847485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.