Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39989749›Full record

ReviewPeerJ2025

A review of behavioral testing in decapod shrimp (Caridea) and prawns (Dendrobranchiata) with applications for welfare assessment in aquaculture.

Dana L M Campbell, Caroline Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Feeding behaviour of broodstockVeterinary and animal science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dana L M CampbellAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.
Caroline LeeAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolving societal expectations are driving increasing interest in the welfare of decapod crustaceans, such as prawns and shrimp, grown in aquaculture. A key aspect of understanding an animal's welfare-related needs is through assessing their behavior to determine how the animal is perceiving and interacting with their environment. Behavioral testing has been applied to livestock animals for decades, providing insight into their wants and needs to guide housing structure design and husbandry practices that improve their welfare. This review collated studies that have applied behavioral testing, primarily at the individual level, to decapod shrimp and prawns in the Dendrobranchiata and Caridea sub- and infra-orders respectively. This review aims to understand the types of assessments that can be successfully applied to these taxa, and what the results of testing may be able to inform us about in regard to the welfare of these species. While the sentience capabilities of these decapod taxa is still under debate, the behavioral testing applied to date across varying species demonstrates they exhibit preferences across multiple contexts, individual differences indicative of personality, cognitive capabilities, and behavioral indicators consistent with negative affective states. There is scope to learn from livestock welfare assessment using behavioral testing and increase the research focused on penaeid shrimp and prawn species of aquaculture interest. Application and validation of new behavioral tests can guide system optimization for aquaculture shrimp and prawns in relation to the welfare of the animals.

Indexed as

Animal WelfareAquacultureBehavior, AnimalDecapodaAnimalsAffective stateCognitionCrustaceanIndividualPenaeidaePersonalityPreference

Identifiers

PMID39989749
PMCPMC11844257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.