ReviewPeerJ2025
Unravelling approaches to study macrophages: from classical to novel biophysical methodologies.
Review in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The M1/M2 Test System for Determining Macrophage Phenotypes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Use of the J774A.1 Cell Line as a Model in the In Vitro Study of Extracellular Vesicle Secretion from Histiocytic Sarcoma in Patients with Bacterial Co-Infections.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Macrophages play crucial roles in immune responses and tissue homeostasis. Despite the fact that macrophages were described more than a century ago, they continue to be the cells of intensive interest. Advanced understanding of phenotypic diversity in macrophages holds great promise for development of cell-based therapeutic strategies. The introduction of innovative approaches in cell biology greatly enhances our ability to investigate the unique characteristics of macrophages. The review considers both classical methods to study macrophages and high-tech approaches, including single-cell sequencing, single-cell mass spectrometry, droplet microfluidics, scanning probe microscopy and atomic force spectroscopy. This review will be valuable both to specialists beginning their study of macrophages and to experienced scientists seeking to deepen their understanding of methods at the intersection of biological and physical sciences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.