ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of New Zealand2025
Next day cochlear implant switch-on: the New Zealand experience.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hearing and balance research in Aotearoa New Zealand: sound and stable foundations for the future.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to review the practice of next-day cochlear implant activation, or switch-on, after surgery for adult cochlear recipients in northern New Zealand. A retrospective observational study compared next-day and three-week post-surgical outcomes related to early complications, electrode impedance values, speech perception outcomes and the number of patient appointments and speech processor MAPs to the point of stabilisation. Over a five-year period, 167 consecutively implanted recipients were included in this review. Results indicate that less time from surgery to switch-on had no impact on the incidence of wound or fitting complications, and resulted in lower initial impedance measures, fewer hours of follow-up visits and fewer MAPs during the subsequent nine months. Speech perception outcomes did not differ between the early and later switch-on groups. General satisfaction with next-day switch-on practices has resulted in consistent use of this protocol with high patient and clinician satisfaction and improved clinical efficiencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.