Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39989594›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025

Smartphone-based health monitoring in India: Data collection and evaluation for pulse rate estimation.

Achal Shetty, Sanjana S Narasimhamurthy, K S Nataraj, Srilakshmi M Prabhu, Neha Jagadeesh, Kunal Katre, Sumit Kumar, Neelesh Kapoor, Sudhir P Haladi, Sankalp Gulati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Achal ShettyDepartment of Community Medicine, Father Muller Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Sanjana S NarasimhamurthyMedical Affairs, Eka Care, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
K S NatarajDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Indian Institute of Information Technology, Dharwad, Karnataka, India.
Srilakshmi M PrabhuDepartment of General Medicine, Father Muller Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Neha JagadeeshEngineering, Eka Care, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Kunal KatreDesign, Eka Care, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Sumit KumarEngineering, Eka Care, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Neelesh KapoorMedical Affairs, Eka Care, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Sudhir P HaladiDepartment of Community Medicine, Father Muller Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Sankalp GulatiData Science, Eka Care, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Over the past decade, monitoring of body vitals has gained significant popularity, specifically during and post the recent COVID pandemic. Advancements in smartphones and wearables have been pivotal, providing accessible and cost-effective solutions for at-home health monitoring. Their development often requires a large corpus of labeled datasets, but such large and diverse datasets for developing smartphone-based vital estimation systems, particularly adapted to Indian context, are scarce. Aims and Objectives: This observational study focuses on development of such a dataset in a diverse Indian context and evaluation of smartphone-based pulse rate estimation based on this dataset. Methods: Data collection considered Indian patients with various medical conditions, body mass index profiles, blood pressure levels, ages, and smoking habits, reflecting a broad demographic spectrum. As part of this study, an algorithm was implemented to estimate the photoplethysmogram (PPG) signal from video recordings of fingers placed on the smartphone camera and subsequently to estimate pulse rate using the acquired PPG data. Smartphone-based pulse rate estimates were compared with readings from pulse oximeters to assess accuracy and feasibility. Results: The smartphone-based PPG algorithm provides reasonably accurate estimations of pulse rate when compared to traditional pulse oximeters under varied healthcare settings (mean absolute error < 5, intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.90). Conclusion: Results indicate that the smartphone-based PPG signal captures sufficient information of the cardiac cycle to reliably estimate the pulse rate. Furthermore, system accuracy is consistent across varied subjects and settings, highlighting the importance of tailored data collection for development and evaluation of vital estimation algorithms.

Indexed as

Machine learningoximeterphotoplethysmogrampulse ratesmartphone

Identifiers

PMID39989594
PMCPMC11844976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.