Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39989587›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025

Efficacy of ultrasonography and mammography in detecting features of breast cancer.

Sultan Abdulwadoud Alshoabi, Amal A Alareqi, Moawia Gameraddin, Awadia Gareeballah, Kamal D Alsultan, Amel F Alzain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sultan Abdulwadoud AlshoabiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Al-Madinah Almunawwarah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Amal A AlareqiRadiology Department, 21 September University of Medical and Applied Science, Sana'a, Republic of Yemen.
Moawia GameraddinDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Al-Madinah Almunawwarah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Awadia GareeballahDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Al-Madinah Almunawwarah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Kamal D AlsultanDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Al-Madinah Almunawwarah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Amel F AlzainDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Al-Madinah Almunawwarah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer (BC) is considered one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers. Early detection is critical for effective management. This study aims to assess the utility of ultrasonography (US) and mammography (MG) in detecting BC features. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study involved the electronic records of 263 female patients diagnosed with BC. The mean age was 45.71 ± 12.25 years (17-90 years). A cross-tabulation test was performed to correlate the presence of each malignant feature (Yes/No) on both US and MG and the final ultrasonography diagnosis (benign/malignant). The compatibility between the presence of each feature on both imaging techniques was measured by the percentage of agreement in reporting the feature that was reported as Kappa. The sensitivity and specificity for each feature were calculated, and the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to measure the area under the curve for each feature on both modalities. Results: The strong compatibility between the two techniques was 87.1%, 94.29%, 66.92%, 79.85%, 77.56%, 77.18, and 79.84% for irregular shape, uncircumscribed, spiculated margins, tissue distortion, nipple retraction, skin thickening, and the presence of lymphadenopathy, respectively ( Conclusion: US and MG images show similar morphological changes, enhancing diagnostic accuracy in breast lesions. US characterizes echogenicity, provides real-time imaging, and uses color and pulsed Doppler techniques for vascularity and lymphadenopathy detection, while MG is better for identifying different calcification types.

Indexed as

Breast cancerirregular shape of breast lesionmammographyspiculated margins of breast lesionultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID39989587
PMCPMC11844950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.