ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Knowledge, attitude and acceptability for long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods among women attending contraception counselling sessions: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: To study the knowledge, attitude, and acceptability of Long-acting Reversible Contraceptive (LARC) methods among women attending contraception counselling sessions. Settings and Design: A cross-sectional study conducted in the family planning clinic of a tertiary care hospital. Methods and Material: Women aged 18-45 years attending contraception counselling sessions were included. Baseline knowledge about LARC methods was assessed. They were given information about LARC methods. Acceptability was assessed on a scale of 0-10. Results: Among four LARC methods, awareness about copper intrauterine devices (CuIUD), DMPA injection, subdermal implant and Mirena was 95%, 55.50%, 27% and 3%, respectively. Around 4% were unaware of the LARC method. Of total, 76.50% women procured the LARC methods information from health care workers, whereas 40% attained from friends, family members, neighbors, or colleagues. After counseling, the majority (58%) were willing for subdermal implant. About 27.50% and 13.50% were willing for copper IUD insertion and injection DMPA, respectively. None was willing for Mirena. Acceptability of various LARC methods was scaled on an acceptability score from 0 to 10. For Cu IUD, implanon and DMPA, the acceptability score was 10 in 50%, 40.17% and 25%, respectively. Conclusions: There are still gaps of knowledge about benefits and safety of available LARC methods. To improve wide coverage and more acceptability of LARC methods, involvement of health care workers and addition of subdermal implants to contraceptive counseling should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.