ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Investigating Gram-negative bacilli isolates' sensitivity to ceftazidime/avibactam.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Is Ceftazidime-Avibactam become a savior for carbapenem-resistant organisms or need something more?Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Multidrug resistant (MDR) Gram negative organisms are becoming increasingly common. Carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) pose a major threat and necessitate the development of new antibiotics. MDR and carbapenem resistant infections, which are common in intensive care units and hospitals, lead to increased morbidity, mortality, prolonged hospital stays, and higher healthcare costs. New antimicrobials such as ceftazidime avibactam offer potential alternatives to conventional treatments such as tigecycline and colistin, which have significant side effects and limitations. Aim: This study focuses on the antibiotic susceptibility of ceftazidime/ avibactam to Gram negative bacilli found in a large number of clinical samples collected from a tertiary care facility in Netaji Subhas Medical University and Hospital, Bihta, India. Methodology: The study included 81 Gram negative bacteria isolated from patient samples. Based on the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines mentioned in the Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method. Result and Conclusion: the results showed that ceftazidime avibactam inhibited 89.9% of the Enterobacteriaceae isolates, which was higher than the 80.3% of amikacin and the 85.1% of meropenem. Ceftazidime avibactam was effective against CRE isolates in 69.9% of cases and against MDR isolates in urine in 94% of cases, which was higher than the 40% of ceftriaxone and 94% of nitrofurantoin. The results show that ceftazidime avibactam can cure MDR and CRE infections, especially urinary tract infections, better than conventional antibiotics, which is a great help in the fight against increasing antibiotic resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.