Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39989506›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia research. Cognition2025

Subjective cognition in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: Investigation of group differences and associations with objective cognition and clinical characteristics using a novel measure of subjective cognition.

Kristoffer Grimstad, Håkon Sørensen, Anja Vaskinn, Christine Mohn, Stine Holmstul Olsen, Ole A Andreassen, Trine Vik Lagerberg, Ingrid Melle, Merete Glenne Øie, Torill Ueland and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia research. Cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Reply to Stip and colleagues.Schizophrenia research. Cognition · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kristoffer GrimstadDepartment of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Håkon SørensenDepartment of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Anja VaskinnCenter for Research and Education in Forensic Psychiatry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Christine MohnNational Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Stine Holmstul OlsenSection for Clinical Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ole A AndreassenCentre for Precision Psychiatry, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Trine Vik LagerbergSection for Clinical Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ingrid MelleSection for Clinical Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Merete Glenne ØieDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Torill UelandSection for Clinical Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Beathe HaatveitCentre for Precision Psychiatry, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive dysfunction is a well-documented feature of schizophrenia (SZ) and bipolar (BD) disorder. The person's subjective experience of cognitive difficulties is less investigated. Here we investigated subjective cognition in SZ and BD compared to healthy controls (HC). Subjective and objective cognition were assessed in 91 SZ participants, 55 BD participants and 55 HC, applying a novel measure of subjective cognition, the self-assessed cognitive complaints scale (SACCS) and a clinically relevant neuropsychological test battery. The psychometric properties of SACCS were investigated. The relationship between subjective and objective cognition, and subjective cognition and clinical variables were explored in SZ and BD. The SACCS showed adequate psychometric properties. Clinical groups reported significantly more cognitive complaints than HCs, without differences between SZ and BD. There were no significant associations between subjective and objective cognitive measures. There was a small trend association between subjective cognition and insight in SZ participants, and moderate sized associations between subjective cognition and general psychopathology and functioning in BD participants. Although SZ participants are more cognitively impaired than BD participants, the two groups report similar levels of subjective cognitive complaints, with no association between subjective and objective cognition. Our results suggest that the expression of subjective cognition is associated with different clinical factors in SZ and BD.

Indexed as

Cognitive complaintsCognitive impairmentFunctioningNeurocognitionPsychotic disordersSubjective assessment

Identifiers

PMID39989506
PMCPMC11846586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.