Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39989363›Full record

ArticleReproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene2025

Standardisation of Dog Sperm Morphology Classification.

Leonardo F C Brito, Marco C da Silva, Kara A Kolster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leonardo F C BritoDepartment of Clinical Studies-New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0675-612X
Marco C da SilvaDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, The Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Kara A KolsterSpringfield Veterinary Center, Glen Allen, Virginia, USA.

Funding

American Kennel Club Canine Health Foundation 03045-A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sperm morphology is an important component of dog fertility analysis. Visual examination is the gold standard technique for evaluation, but large variations within and across evaluators have been documented. Databases of sperm morphology images are valuable practical aids for training and performance testing and can improve sperm classification standardisation; however, such databases are only useful when the material is expertly classified to serve as a reference. The objective of this study was to build an expertly annotated database of sperm images and to generate an illustrated guide with examples of the different sperm morphology presentations to promote standardisation in dog sperm morphology classification. Semen samples (n = 42) were obtained either from dogs presented for fertility evaluation or from semen doses used for artificial insemination. For image acquisition, wet preparations were prepared and evaluated using phase-contrast optics under 1000× magnification. Selected images were cropped so that only one sperm was included in each file, and a database of 8817 images was created. The images were classified by three veterinarians, specialists in animal reproduction (Diplomates American College of Theriogenologists) according to different criteria. Agreement among evaluators was the criterion used to create a database with reconciled classification. Complete agreement on defect category and morphological classification was observed on 70.2% of the images, and at least two veterinarians agreed on the classification of another 27.4% of the images; therefore, the reconciled database classification was based on the consensus of at least two veterinarians on 97.5% of the images. The percentage of morphologically normal sperm in the reconciled database was 57%, with the primary defect involving the sperm head, midpiece, or tail in 18%, 20%, and 5% of the cases, respectively. Among defective sperm, 39% had a single defect and 4% had multiple defects. When the total prevalence of specific defects was computed, the reconciled database contained 18% sperm head abnormalities, 22% midpiece abnormalities, and 7% tail abnormalities. Comprehensive illustrations of the variation in normal and abnormal dog sperm morphology from the database built based on reconciled expert classification are provided for reference.

Indexed as

Semen AnalysisSpermatozoaAnimalsDatabases, FactualDogsMaledogsemen analysissperm defectsspermiogramsperm morphology

Identifiers

PMID39989363
PMCPMC11848706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.