Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39989304›Full record

ArticleJournal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists2026

In Vitro Investigation of Microcatheter Behavior During Microsphere Injection in Transarterial Radioembolization.

Tess Josien Snoeijink, Jan Lucas van der Hoek, Hadi Mirgolbabaee, Tristan Gerard Vlogman, Joey Roosen, Johannes Frank Wilhelmus Nijsen, Erik Groot Jebbink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tess Josien SnoeijinkDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4403-7916
Jan Lucas van der HoekMulti-Modality Medical Imaging Group, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2383-1929
Hadi MirgolbabaeeMulti-Modality Medical Imaging Group, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6291-7170
Tristan Gerard VlogmanDepartment of Thermal and Fluid Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8720-7949
Joey RoosenDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7965-6664
Johannes Frank Wilhelmus NijsenDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7625-2253
Erik Groot JebbinkMulti-Modality Medical Imaging Group, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7041-8603

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo experimentally investigate the behavior of a clinically used microcatheter during transarterial radioembolization (TARE) microsphere injection in a successively bifurcating MATERIALS AND

methodsA symmetrical phantom was developed which bifurcated 3 times into 8 outlets. A blood-mimicking fluid was pumped through the phantom using a physiological representative waveform. Holmium-165 microspheres were injected in a pulsed manner at 3 different locations using a standard microcatheter and a rigid counterpart with same dimensions as a control. Motion of the catheter was studied with a top- and side-view camera on the phantom. Microspheres were collected at each outlet and their distribution over the 8 outlets was analyzed.

resultsDue to the pulsatile flow in the phantom, strengthened by the pulsatile microsphere injection, the clinical catheter showed maximum displacements of 0.87 mm within a vessel with a diameter of 3.6 mm. This motion resulted in a different microsphere distribution for the clinical catheter compared with the rigid counterpart (75.9% vs 49.4% of the microspheres went to outlet 1-4, respectively).

conclusionIn this

Indexed as

CathetersHolmiumMicrospheresRadioembolization, TherapeuticRadioisotopesRadiopharmaceuticalsVascular Access DevicesEquipment DesignHumansMaterials TestingModels, CardiovascularPhantoms, ImagingPulsatile FlowTime FactorsHolmiumHolmium-166RadioisotopesRadiopharmaceuticalsdistributionin vitromicrospheresradioembolizationTARE

Identifiers

PMID39989304
PMCPMC13371155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.