Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39989135›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

Characterization of artificial intelligence performance for lesion detection using synthetic lesions in PET imaging.

Quinn de Bourbon, Shadab Ahamed, Paul Blanc-Durand, Arman Rahmim, Ran Klein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Quinn de BourbonDepartment of Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
Shadab AhamedDepartment of Physics & Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Paul Blanc-DurandPaul Blanc-Durand is with the Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU Henri Mondor, Paris-Est University, Créteil, France.
Arman RahmimDepartment of Physics & Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Ran KleinDepartment of Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPAS-2020-00107Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2020-04741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of artificial intelligence (AI) for lesion detection has witnessed increased interest and efforts in recent years. Meanwhile, task-specific characterization and comparison of AI performance is lacking as supportive evidence prior to its implementation in the clinical setting. PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of synthetic lesions in positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) to characterize the performance of lesion detection AI in terms of their limits of detection.

methodsAn image library was constructed containing 565 well-characterized synthetic lesions in 114 reconstructed studies from 56 real, disease-free PET/CT patient data. Using the Lesion Synthesis Toolbox (LST), lesions were manually defined in terms of location, size and intensity. These lesions were then synthesized, forward projected, and added to the raw patient PET data before reconstruction using the same methods used clinically. Lesions were also appended to the reconstructed CT images. This library was sent to two external research teams developing AI for lesion detection in fluorodeoxyglucose (

resultsBoth AI methods confirmed higher lesion detection rates with increased lesion size and contrast. One AI consistently outperformed the other in terms of number of reported lesions, sensitivity, and precision. The fitted psychophysical response model demonstrated both graphically and parametrically an ability of this model to detect smaller lesions for a given degree of reliability. For example, 10 mm diameter lesions could be detected with 90% sensitivity at 8:1 versus 16:1 lesion to background ratio for the two algorithms. Likewise, 3:1 contrast lesions could be detected with 90% sensitivity when lesion diameters were approximately 16 and 31 mm for each algorithm respectively. Compared to defined lesions parameters, the corresponding AI segmented lesions had lower contrast, consistent with partial volume effects in PET imaging, and also smaller size.

conclusionSynthetic lesions are a useful tool to characterize the performance of lesion detection by an observer. Visual and psychometric response models of lesion detection performance with respect to lesion characteristics are effective to objectively compare AI performance on the merit of limits of detection. These methods can be applied to objectively compare lesion detection performance with any alternative decision support tool including human and machine observers, display technologies, and image generation systems.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansFluorodeoxyglucose F18artificial intelligencelesion detectionPET/CT imagingsynthetic lesions

Identifiers

PMID39989135
PMCPMC12149679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.