ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs2025
On the use of external controls in clinical trials.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Directly comparing randomized and real-world controls in adjuvant breast cancer.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2026Article
- How can innovative trials in juvenile idiopathic arthritis serve the unmet needs of patients?Arthritis research & therapy · 2026Review
- Comments on "Neurological efficacy and safety of RNA therapeutics in hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials".Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Externally controlled trials have commonly been used when conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) is not feasible or ethical. By allowing the study of new treatments, use of external controls can lead to accelerated advances in the management of rare diseases. The use of external controls, however, introduces new challenges due to potential differences between the population the external controls are enrolled from and the population the patients on the new trial are enrolled from. Some differences include, but are not limited to, differences in how patients are diagnosed and treated, differences in the case mix of the underlying populations, differences in the ability to measure outcomes, and differences in data collection. We discuss the potential benefits and challenges of externally controlled trials, as well as strategies to mitigate bias, including the estimand and target-trial emulation framework. We also provide a brief overview of statistical methodology commonly used in these settings. We note that although the strategies presented may help mitigate some of these challenges, they cannot replace an RCT framework, and investigators should be aware of the potential limitations of externally controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.