Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39988996›Full record

Observational studyAging & mental health2025

Social resources and emotional well-being in older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment.

Claire M Growney, Tammy English

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Aging & mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Emotion Dynamics in Young and Cognitively Diverse Older Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Claire M GrowneyDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2149-7840
Tammy EnglishDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6666-4780

Funding

AGING AND DEVELOPMENTT32AG000030 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DENISE HEAD, Jeffrey M Zacks · 1985 to 2026
$9.7M
Mild Cognitive Impairment and Emotion Regulation in Naturalistic ContextsR21AG062841 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ENGLISH, TAMMY · 2019 to 2020
$432k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG062841NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAcross adulthood close social partners are increasingly prioritized and socioemotional skills typically improve. We investigate whether age-related benefits in emotional well-being and social resources emerge in both cognitively normal (CN) older adults and older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and whether associations between well-being and social resources vary between these older groups and young adults.

methodYoung adults (aged 21-34,

resultsOlder adults with MCI had higher well-being than young adults, but lower well-being than CN older adults. Young adults generally had higher social engagement than both older adult groups and lower social quality than CN older adults. Social engagement and quality were both positively associated with well-being, especially among CN older adults.

conclusionFindings suggest older adults with MCI somewhat maintain age-related advantages in emotional well-being, but not social functioning. Older adults with MCI (and young adults) may also not be as effective in leveraging social resources to support their well-being.

Indexed as

AgingCognitive DysfunctionEmotionsSocial InteractionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAge differencescognitionexperience samplingrelationshipssocioemotional selectivity theory

Identifiers

PMID39988996
PMCPMC12129693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.