ReviewMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy2025
Presetting CAR-T cells during ex vivo biomanufacturing.
Review in Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cytokine co-presentation on targeted lipid nanoparticles enhances in vivo T cell engineering.Biomaterials · 2027Article
- Potential effects of endogenous RNA/DNA hybrids on CRISPR-Cas9-mediated homology-directed repair.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Article
- Microbiota-derived metabolic priming of CAR-T cell fitness: a translational framework for next-generation cell therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Plying potency assays for immunotherapy of solid tumors.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Review
- Redirecting Cholesterol Metabolism DuringInternational journal of biological sciences · 2026Article
- Impact of IL-21 on CAR T-cell manufacturing: phenotypic, metabolic, and functional outcomes.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Challenges in the preclinical design and assessment of CAR-T cells.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of hematologic malignancies. However, it continues to encounter significant obstacles, including treatment relapse and limited efficacy in solid tumors. While effector T cells exhibit robust cytotoxicity, central memory T cells and stem cell-like T cells are essential for in vivo expansion, long-term survival, and persistence. Strategies such as genetic engineering to enhance CAR-T cell efficacy and durability are often accompanied by increased safety risks, which not only raise regulatory approval thresholds but also escalate CAR-T production costs. In contrast, optimizing ex vivo manufacturing conditions represents a more straightforward and practical approach, offering the potential for rapid application to commercially approved CAR-T products and enhancement of their clinical outcomes. This review examines several factors that have been shown to improve T cell memory phenotype and in vivo cytotoxic activity, including cytokines, electrolytes, signaling pathway inhibitors, metabolic modulators, and epigenetic agents. The insights provided will guide the optimization of CAR-T cell industrial production. Furthermore, considerations for selecting appropriate conditions are discussed, balancing effectiveness, cost-efficiency, safety, and regulatory compliance while addressing current challenges in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.