Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39988865›Full record

ReviewAdvanced healthcare materials2025

Harnessing Nanohybridized Niclosamide for Precision Mpox Therapeutics.

N Sanoj Rejinold, Geun-Woo Jin, Jin-Ho Choy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced healthcare materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

N Sanoj RejinoldIntelligent Nanohybrid Materials Laboratory (INML), Department of Chemistry, College of Science and Technology, Dankook University, Cheonan, 31116, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7045-0563
Geun-Woo JinR&D Center, Hyundai Bioscience Co. LTD, Seoul, 03759, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5561-1103
Jin-Ho ChoyIntelligent Nanohybrid Materials Laboratory (INML), Department of Chemistry, College of Science and Technology, Dankook University, Cheonan, 31116, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4149-7100

Funding

National Academy of Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Niclosamide, initially developed as an anthelmintic, has recently emerged as a potential antiviral, showing efficacy against diverse viral threats, including Mpox. As the global health landscape faces recurrent Mpox outbreaks, repurposing niclosamide through advanced material strategies offers promising therapeutic avenues. This article explores the antiviral mechanisms of niclosamide, focusing on how innovative nano-hybrid formulations enhance its bioavailability and pharmacological performance. By leveraging nanohybridization, niclosamide's limitations-such as poor solubility and bioavailability-are addressed, enabling targeted delivery and sustained release. Early preclinical studies reveal that niclosamide disrupts Mpox replication and entry processes, suggesting its utility as a therapeutic option against poxvirus infections. Looking forward, further in vitro, animal models, and clinical investigations are essential to optimize its application and dosing for Mpox. With continued development in advanced materials, nanohybrid niclosamide could become a critical tool in managing Mpox and related viral threats, offering an accessible, cost-effective option for outbreak preparedness.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsNiclosamideAnimalsDrug RepositioningHumansMpox, MonkeypoxAntiviral AgentsNiclosamidebioavailability enhancementMpox antiviral therapynanohybrid formulationsniclosamide repurposingpoxvirus therapeutic strategies

Identifiers

PMID39988865
PMCPMC12118342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.