ArticleThe Journal of physiology2025
Blue plaque review series: A.V. Hill, athletic records and the birth of exercise physiology.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Carbon monoxide and other "tricks" in sports: does the winner take it all?Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Status quo of Experimental Physiology - Anno 2025: What's in a name?Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Pioneers and paradigms in sprint science: a thematic historical mini review.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One hundred years ago, A.V. Hill authored three manuscripts analysing athletic world records from a physiological perspective. That analysis, grounded in Hill's understanding of contemporary muscle bioenergetics, provides a fascinating sketch of the thoughts and speculations of one of the fathers of exercise physiology. In this review, we reflect on Hill's prose with the benefit of 100 years of hindsight, and illustrate how Hill was able to draw startlingly accurate conclusions from what limited data were available on the physiology of intense exercise. Hill discusses the energetics of running, swimming, rowing and cycling in both males and females, as well as addressing exercise performance in horses and the mechanics of jumping. He also considers sports nutrition, pacing strategy and ultra-endurance exercise. Perhaps most impactfully, he establishes that the speed-duration relationship has characteristics that reflect the underlying physiological basis of exercise performance. That physiology, in turn, differs depending on the duration of the event itself, providing one of the first descriptions of the task-dependent nature of mechanisms limiting exercise tolerance. A remarkable feature of Hill's papers is that they were written just a few years before a major revolution in muscle biochemistry, and yet Hill was still able to develop conceptually sound ideas about human performance. His hypotheses require only minor revision to bring them into line with current understanding. In reaching their centenary, therefore, the surprising feature of these papers is not how well they have aged, but how relevant they remain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.