ArticleExperimental physiology2025
Two-tone suppression between the ultrasounds above and within the hearing range in mice.
Article in Experimental physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bone-conducted ultrasonic auditory brainstem response thresholds in a mouse model of cisplatin-induced hearing loss.PloS one · 2026Article
- Two-tone suppression between the ultrasounds above and within the hearing range in mice.Experimental physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hearing range differs among various species. Ultrasound, which is audible to microbats and dolphins, is inaudible to humans through air conduction. However, it can create an auditory sensation when the stimulation is transmitted through the temporal bone. This phenomenon is known as ultrasonic hearing - sounds at frequencies exceeding the normal hearing range participate in audition. Mice are among the animals that possess one of the highest upper limits of the hearing range. Although ultrasonic hearing has been experimentally demonstrated in humans and guinea pigs, its existence in mice and interaction with ultrasound within the hearing range remain unknown. In this study, we found that ultrasound above the hearing range delivered through the temporal bone evokes the cochlear microphonic potential (CM) in mice. The CM synchronized with the applied single-tone ultrasound, and was actively amplified. Furthermore, the amplitudes of the CM were suppressed by sound with subharmonic frequencies of the applied frequencies. The results indicate that hair cells in mice can detect ultrasound stimuli with frequencies over 120 kHz and ultrasounds within and above the hearing range evoked hair cell currents at the close position along the cochlea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.